Great Aussie GenderSpecial #42 on Nostr: e.g. this person https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00169-7 > A 22-year-old ...
e.g. this person https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00169-7
> A 22-year-old Chinese woman presented to our clinic with a history of primary amenorrhea. The patient was 163 cm in height and 50 kg in weight. Physical examination showed moderately developed breasts (Tanner stage III), normal pubic hair, scant axillary hair, and normal external genitalia. Pelvic examination revealed the presence of a normal cervix and a uterus. The vagina was 8 cm in length. Bilateral adnexa were palpable without apparent adnexal masses. An abdominal ultrasonographic examination revealed a 4.5 × 3 cm uterus without intraabdominal masses. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a 46,XY karyotype.
If a person like this trained their whole life and made it onto the Olympic team I think common sense would say they should be allowed to compete in the female category. Of course the IOC should be transparent about this.
> A 22-year-old Chinese woman presented to our clinic with a history of primary amenorrhea. The patient was 163 cm in height and 50 kg in weight. Physical examination showed moderately developed breasts (Tanner stage III), normal pubic hair, scant axillary hair, and normal external genitalia. Pelvic examination revealed the presence of a normal cervix and a uterus. The vagina was 8 cm in length. Bilateral adnexa were palpable without apparent adnexal masses. An abdominal ultrasonographic examination revealed a 4.5 × 3 cm uterus without intraabdominal masses. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a 46,XY karyotype.
If a person like this trained their whole life and made it onto the Olympic team I think common sense would say they should be allowed to compete in the female category. Of course the IOC should be transparent about this.