techfeudalist on Nostr: Peter says: “Unlike OP_CAT, CTV doesn’t appear to raise much risk of unintended ...
Peter says:
“Unlike OP_CAT, CTV doesn’t appear to raise much risk of unintended consequences beyond encouraging out-of-band fee payments in certain cases. This isn’t ideal. But no-one has come up with a widely supported alternative.
My personal recommendation: do a consensus cleanup soft-fork, followed by CTV.”
Peter admits it creates risk, but then claims omniscience to state that the risk is minimal.
Activate OP_GFY instead!!
ADD NO RISK TO BITCOIN. You have no right to gamble with the world’s money, and our hope for the future.
TheGuySwann (npub1h8n…rpev) … another dev admitting that it adds risk.
“Unlike OP_CAT, CTV doesn’t appear to raise much risk of unintended consequences beyond encouraging out-of-band fee payments in certain cases. This isn’t ideal. But no-one has come up with a widely supported alternative.
My personal recommendation: do a consensus cleanup soft-fork, followed by CTV.”
Peter admits it creates risk, but then claims omniscience to state that the risk is minimal.
Activate OP_GFY instead!!
ADD NO RISK TO BITCOIN. You have no right to gamble with the world’s money, and our hope for the future.
TheGuySwann (npub1h8n…rpev) … another dev admitting that it adds risk.
quoting note1nwv…fuqp#Bitcoin scaling, Trustless L2s, covenants, future soft forks.
Some clarity about many controversial topics by pkt (npub1ej4…ndrm), courtesy of Fulgur Ventures!
note1num…uxr9