npub1mu…kqv3e on Nostr: Hang in there man. You are right to do that, but at the same time the company is ...

Hang in there man. You are right to do that, but at the same time the company is being forced to do it by their insurance company. If they do NOT do that then their insurance rates climb precipitously. In reality it is simply a way to train people to be accustomed to a camera in their face every single day of their lives forever and get them accustomed to being severely punished if the camera turns off. You will be replaced by a camera lover and he will make more money than you because he accepts those situations more than you. Then he will wreck the truck and the insurance company won't have to pay out because of the records that the cameras produced. Your former company will have to eat the cost there since there is a 0 correlation between someone's tolerance of being watched with a camera an their ability to safely drive a vehicle...

I wonder what your bosses would say when that happens? You should present that idea to them as a reason for why they are forced to drive you out based on your camera-toleration as opposed to your driving ability? Ask them if they understand that the reason the insurance company gives them a better rate is because they will use the camera to NOT pay a claim whenever possible. See what they say...