ancaprevolt on Nostr: You are muted, I didn’t lie. Other people reply to you and I get notifications for ...
You are muted, I didn’t lie. Other people reply to you and I get notifications for it, and then I check what you’re saying.
The section you are referring to does not permit raping a prepubescent child. It says that it is not intercourse in the halakhic sense, that it is more akin to physical assault. Just because it gives a lesser punishment for raping a child than it does for raping a woman does not mean that it permits pedophilia. Your confirmation bias has led you to misinterpret what is said. If you had done any research on the topic you would know that it does not permit raping children, it is just that there is a lesser penalty since their hymen can supposedly regrow. Again, this is not in the Tanakh, it’s in the Talmud, which is rabbinical interpretation of the Tanakh. This interpretation is ancient, and yet it still clearly does not PERMIT child rape.
Further, it clearly states that a girl under 12 most likely does not understand her vows. It states that a girl is not a grown woman until 18.
Muhammad (hellfire and eternal torture upon him) absolutely existed. Have you read any Hadiths? Aisha clearly states that she was 6 when she was betrothed to him and 9 when they consummated the marriage. Clearly, if it is acceptable for their prophet, it is acceptable in Islam. Islam provides no definition of womanhood, while the Talmud is very clear in its definitions. The Old Testament is also quite clear on it. Islam does not forbid child marriage and it explicitly permits raping married women if they are captives of war.
I do judge all Muslims the same, because they are Muslims. No person who dies a Muslim or Jew will have eternal life.
In what world could October 7th be construed as self defense? In what world is attacking a music festival self defense? In what world is a group — that has the stated goal of the extermination of Judaism — attacking civilian Jews self defense? How in the world can you construe any attack ever made by Muslims as self defense? Do you even know how Muslims ended up in the holy land?
The section you are referring to does not permit raping a prepubescent child. It says that it is not intercourse in the halakhic sense, that it is more akin to physical assault. Just because it gives a lesser punishment for raping a child than it does for raping a woman does not mean that it permits pedophilia. Your confirmation bias has led you to misinterpret what is said. If you had done any research on the topic you would know that it does not permit raping children, it is just that there is a lesser penalty since their hymen can supposedly regrow. Again, this is not in the Tanakh, it’s in the Talmud, which is rabbinical interpretation of the Tanakh. This interpretation is ancient, and yet it still clearly does not PERMIT child rape.
Further, it clearly states that a girl under 12 most likely does not understand her vows. It states that a girl is not a grown woman until 18.
Muhammad (hellfire and eternal torture upon him) absolutely existed. Have you read any Hadiths? Aisha clearly states that she was 6 when she was betrothed to him and 9 when they consummated the marriage. Clearly, if it is acceptable for their prophet, it is acceptable in Islam. Islam provides no definition of womanhood, while the Talmud is very clear in its definitions. The Old Testament is also quite clear on it. Islam does not forbid child marriage and it explicitly permits raping married women if they are captives of war.
I do judge all Muslims the same, because they are Muslims. No person who dies a Muslim or Jew will have eternal life.
In what world could October 7th be construed as self defense? In what world is attacking a music festival self defense? In what world is a group — that has the stated goal of the extermination of Judaism — attacking civilian Jews self defense? How in the world can you construe any attack ever made by Muslims as self defense? Do you even know how Muslims ended up in the holy land?