Baldur Bjarnason on Nostr: Post-hoc explanations based on personal interactions with processes that are ...
Post-hoc explanations based on personal interactions with processes that are substantially random will generally be incorrect. The observed patterns will be random, not systemic
IOW, everything written about LLMs from the perspective of a single practitioner can be dismissed out of hand. The nature of LLMs makes it impossible to distinguish signal from noise in your own practice
I suggest not even reading these posts. Our brains are unfortunately wired to mistake confident writing for evidence
IOW, everything written about LLMs from the perspective of a single practitioner can be dismissed out of hand. The nature of LLMs makes it impossible to distinguish signal from noise in your own practice
I suggest not even reading these posts. Our brains are unfortunately wired to mistake confident writing for evidence