Event JSON
{
"id": "ec9981d8be149062a2c9561cbb62d69446488dbddb2c76b66e5e72e46539480d",
"pubkey": "7a9849292ef710587c2856296cbfc46890a5dd79a6337d629757865a5bb640eb",
"created_at": 1698501135,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"4a0a59e0b028201e8765b9514be012262f110d69bd227168461ae026029a693c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"aa028bb8fb72f7aea9167131f8c5a78734024c88d20e5ef0e1ad50b70c36c5d5",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"c1203ba84271297c5900471b6edb5a94406fad74436f7ef15ec3b2207de157cf",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://eupolicy.social/users/je5perl/statuses/111312970421674222",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1fg99nc9s9qspapm9h9g5hcqjych3zrtfh538z6zxrtszvq56dy7qmttesx Besides the potential hidden agenda of weakening LIBE (which is very bad), it's somewhat odd to propose a \"security and defence\" committee (while seeking to limit the number of committees), when defence is the exclusive competence of Member States in the EU Treaties. But increasingly, the national security exemption in TEU Article 4(2) is only being used to restrict the scope of data protection rights in EU law (so far, mostly by Member States).",
"sig": "b82ccfbb4861d10fae31c0c828876bcd957d43fe0ad1bb6d579e0ace10011b1fb05b7e6c8d15226b48884fda5c380189c3e79ef0479b1352096f6f722c3211ff"
}
