hazel on Nostr: I read your article. You know we don't have strong privacy developed in Bitcoin yet ...
I read your article. You know we don't have strong privacy developed in Bitcoin yet because then exchanges wouldn't be allowed to function, right.
What I see in practice is people confusing the privacy of their financial activity with the need to hide in Bitcoin communities with childish nicknames.
Then the Anons feel entitled to disrespectful communication —misogyny, prejudice—to defend their ideological agendas, such as the Bitcoin Red Pill.
They function as real gold-diggers, gatekeepers, scaring away the novices.
That rotten Anon soup demoralizes the Bitcoin space. There is no safety from privacy there.
What I see in practice is people confusing the privacy of their financial activity with the need to hide in Bitcoin communities with childish nicknames.
Then the Anons feel entitled to disrespectful communication —misogyny, prejudice—to defend their ideological agendas, such as the Bitcoin Red Pill.
They function as real gold-diggers, gatekeepers, scaring away the novices.
That rotten Anon soup demoralizes the Bitcoin space. There is no safety from privacy there.