Julian Lam on Nostr: #FoodForThought — a lot of #Fediverse implementors are Fedi-first, but in @nodebb's ...
#FoodForThought — a lot of #Fediverse implementors are Fedi-first, but in @nodebb's case, we're adding #ActivityPub integration to already existing and established forums. It makes me wonder whether I should think about individual users' #consent to have their content federated outside of the local instance.
All along I assumed I'd just build in a global on-off switch for AP integration, but maybe we need more granular user-level opt-in/out here 🤔
Published at
2023-12-05 20:22:19Event JSON
{
"id": "e29a438bc54e75db2414a32a789bdab61ed3618c84e93a914c24becb90a2129e",
"pubkey": "9491f9228ab18b128c8e08800821e3d958d25b1df637db4221ddd34a1f41d04f",
"created_at": 1701807739,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"foodforthought"
],
[
"t",
"fediverse"
],
[
"t",
"activitypub"
],
[
"t",
"consent"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://crag.social/users/devnull/statuses/111529671989153997",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "#FoodForThought — a lot of #Fediverse implementors are Fedi-first, but in @nodebb's case, we're adding #ActivityPub integration to already existing and established forums. It makes me wonder whether I should think about individual users' #consent to have their content federated outside of the local instance.\n\nAll along I assumed I'd just build in a global on-off switch for AP integration, but maybe we need more granular user-level opt-in/out here 🤔",
"sig": "6596a633a2101240b2b083e3a227c860edd0f7a20bee8616ff67209a41a2bc0c2a10734b9fa186921494546bce00cb299907e38d03454e8f07097f02c47a8273"
}
