Sarah Burstein on Nostr: On the patent infringement claim: "Plaintiff’s post hoc reliance on the doctrine ...
On the patent infringement claim:
"Plaintiff’s post hoc reliance on the doctrine [of equivalents] suggests only that Plaintiff failed to adequately investigate Defendants’ alleged infringement before seeking a TRO; it does not establish that Defendants’ enjoinment was otherwise valid."
Published at
2024-01-04 13:33:06Event JSON
{
"id": "e2a4f5e639508b7808035b43555e1fc7e78b384bd9930e683cc59a0b2de68506",
"pubkey": "9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"created_at": 1704375186,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e04df9d31145bd1f56b9e72dbdb1181e416a09f8cf79787950853ef22b1d74d1",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/design_law/statuses/111697932247524810",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "On the patent infringement claim:\n\n\"Plaintiff’s post hoc reliance on the doctrine [of equivalents] suggests only that Plaintiff failed to adequately investigate Defendants’ alleged infringement before seeking a TRO; it does not establish that Defendants’ enjoinment was otherwise valid.\"\n\nhttps://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/697/923/855/582/543/original/7e9a06e048016b5a.jpg",
"sig": "2f5240717e26521f5952386468b0b029624532136fa31d906c5b7aeef56f9ac80489e4c4b17544a295bd5d62fd315b59d6d146a3cb6b297a561cb3fb82a21627"
}