Upal Chakraborty [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-20 📝 Original message:Regarding... i. ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-08-20
📝 Original message:Regarding...
i.
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010493.html
ii.
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010499.html

Could we please keep the conversation specific to the proposal presented at
http://upalc.com/maxblocksize.php ? If you find any demerits to this,
please point them out. Otherwise, I'll ask for a BIP. The proposal in
algorithmic format is as follows...

If more than 50% of block's size, found in the first 2000 of the last
difficulty period, is more than 90% MaxBlockSize
Double MaxBlockSize
Else if more than 90% of block's size, found in the first 2000 of the
last difficulty period, is less than 50% MaxBlockSize
Half MaxBlockSize
Else
Keep the same MaxBlockSize
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/b5651492/attachment.html>;