eugene on Nostr: I think difficulty to censor is a great feature for a communication network that ...
I think difficulty to censor is a great feature for a communication network that already exists, but I don’t think that feature is enough to drive mass adoption to the protocol in the short term. Most people don’t have an issue of being censored on social media. Maybe over enough time there would be enough censoring to drive more and more people to the protocol…. But it’d be better to have a positive reason to come here as opposed to waiting for enough negative reasons to accumulate.
Published at
2024-08-28 18:52:46Event JSON
{
"id": "e3d5d6a5c7ee2ffcc8694a2d0c4cd91402c99d938f4059ad03db8dcfdfe2a1bd",
"pubkey": "7e5f1f15afc6867962d19b3200c2b6be0464c184c3e679b6c028c9434b7d1da6",
"created_at": 1724871166,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b4095e3c659b9eff43e75d7105f9286342a1e4865107411be96fbadbe2999264",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"15edfe722f4bd2077f677955d6631ab4e0d7917f005e213305d5ca4b1921b7df",
"wss://nostr.oxtr.dev",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e9a45023190ccd5024de289a10e16f20cccee0b8cf0a761693de58ac02f1c156"
]
],
"content": "I think difficulty to censor is a great feature for a communication network that already exists, but I don’t think that feature is enough to drive mass adoption to the protocol in the short term. Most people don’t have an issue of being censored on social media. Maybe over enough time there would be enough censoring to drive more and more people to the protocol…. But it’d be better to have a positive reason to come here as opposed to waiting for enough negative reasons to accumulate.",
"sig": "3d4685c18d8b8dca1e75fd32067cd3afc8e6aab6417a337f091d0f4490b0774d73342f77debdb1f12f24f4c1fa7a54743b6834e5afb9174829e1f30b19051576"
}