Nick ODell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18 📝 Original message: I'm pretty sure that ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18
📝 Original message:
I'm pretty sure that BIP62 is abandonded. At least, the PR based on it
was never merged. BIP66 implements some of it, and rules 2-7 have been
nonstandard for a while, but I don't think that rules 2-7 are enforced
against new blocks.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/ln-deploy-draft-01.pdf
>
> I haven't had time to proofread this properly, nor check the
> script examples. But wanted to post it before the weekend so you all
> have something to chew on :)
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
📝 Original message:
I'm pretty sure that BIP62 is abandonded. At least, the PR based on it
was never merged. BIP66 implements some of it, and rules 2-7 have been
nonstandard for a while, but I don't think that rules 2-7 are enforced
against new blocks.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/ln-deploy-draft-01.pdf
>
> I haven't had time to proofread this properly, nor check the
> script examples. But wanted to post it before the weekend so you all
> have something to chew on :)
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev