Glenn Fleishman on Nostr: I understand that for actors and post-production, having more real and in-camera ...
I understand that for actors and post-production, having more real and in-camera elements makes their job easier? But it feels like an agenda by producers to have a drumbeat of "no CG, no VFX" for some reason—because of the toxic masculine social media film criticism culture’s weird VFX stance, which parallels the misogyny of that culture.
Published at
2024-05-19 19:23:53Event JSON
{
"id": "ed1fc304c3f59de6a4a2dca835a5d6a5f201c462769aba92ea45faaa212e5ea8",
"pubkey": "1259066ea08311bb278605654b33524b435bcd0989a685368377e8c81e3ad3ee",
"created_at": 1716146633,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ac044897edb2736684be5f6b34136fb634e6479e9e2570aa136c50538fcf9cf8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://twit.social/users/glennf/statuses/112469385748935106",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "I understand that for actors and post-production, having more real and in-camera elements makes their job easier? But it feels like an agenda by producers to have a drumbeat of \"no CG, no VFX\" for some reason—because of the toxic masculine social media film criticism culture’s weird VFX stance, which parallels the misogyny of that culture.",
"sig": "6ebf601e65991d012731ed9fbbc6aef7ba767073482feb96a275241b8843518ddfbeff587a4ed5cc8a67f41991832e6403479b2f87a241eb12a2ac54b516dbe8"
}