Dan Goodman on Nostr: nprofile1q…ruc38 I get the philosophical point that there's always interpretation ...

nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4d70xk632yuqshz7hdrnnj79j3yufrphy4u7ryekmpr7vztwvf5qmruc38 (nprofile…uc38) I get the philosophical point that there's always interpretation and that you can't eliminate that. But, the point of showing the data is to stick your neck out and give someone else the best possible chance to say "it doesn't show what you say, it shows something else". Describing it from my own point of view I think can never do that, even imperfectly. If I can't give that opportunity to disagree with my interpretation, maybe there's no point showing the data at all?