aidan on Nostr: Yes, this is virtually identical to Carvalho’s proposal, except I believe better ...
Yes, this is virtually identical to Carvalho’s proposal, except I believe better mainly due to:
* easier route to adoption for both developers and users due to the relatively pristine ‘bits’ moniker
* no need to spend time refuting BIP176 as this obviously supersedes that proposal
* though we can’t predict the names that users will actually use, IMO ‘bits’ seems more likely to be what’s adopted in real world use than ‘bitcoin’
* easier route to adoption for both developers and users due to the relatively pristine ‘bits’ moniker
* no need to spend time refuting BIP176 as this obviously supersedes that proposal
* though we can’t predict the names that users will actually use, IMO ‘bits’ seems more likely to be what’s adopted in real world use than ‘bitcoin’