Jannis Froese [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2014-04-26 š Original message:Am 2014-04-26 22:17, ...
š
Original date posted:2014-04-26
š Original message:Am 2014-04-26 22:17, schrieb Mike Hearn:
> Bitcoin is not a vendor, so I doubt that would work.
By my interpretation of RFC 6838, the Bitcoin Foundation or even Gavin
himself could register a vendor tree for Bitcoin. In the case of the
foundation registering, getting the subtree named vdn.bitcoin should be
no problem.
> I doubt we should spend any time on this. The chance of a string
> collision is extremely low. The current mime types are fine.
It's mostly about the good feeling of having followed the rules and
proper procedures, I doubt that there is a difference in practice
š Original message:Am 2014-04-26 22:17, schrieb Mike Hearn:
> Bitcoin is not a vendor, so I doubt that would work.
By my interpretation of RFC 6838, the Bitcoin Foundation or even Gavin
himself could register a vendor tree for Bitcoin. In the case of the
foundation registering, getting the subtree named vdn.bitcoin should be
no problem.
> I doubt we should spend any time on this. The chance of a string
> collision is extremely low. The current mime types are fine.
It's mostly about the good feeling of having followed the rules and
proper procedures, I doubt that there is a difference in practice