Potter QQ [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-16 📝 Original message:No,Bitcoin 发自我的 ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-16
📝 Original message:No,Bitcoin
发自我的 iPhone
> 在 2015年6月16日，13:28，justusranvier at riseup.net 写道：
>
>> On 2015-06-16 03:49, Kevin Greene wrote:
>> Hah, fair enough, there is no such thing as the "right" way to do
>> anything. But I still think punishing users who use SPV wallets is a
>> less-than-ideal way to incentive people to run full nodes. Right now
>> SPV is
>> the best way that exists for mobile phones to participate in the
>> network in
>> a decentralized way. This proposal makes the user experience for mobile
>> wallets a little more confusing and annoying.
>
> Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. Who
> would provide the nodes they would need connect to? The decentralization
> fairy?
>
> There's absolutely no reason that paying for connectivity would be any
> more confusing or annoying than transaction fees are.
>
> If some full nodes in the network started offering paid connection
> slots, that would just mean that users who checked the "pay subscription
> fee" box in their wallet configuration would have an easier time
> connecting than the users who did't, just like how your transaction
> might eventually get mined without a fee but paying one makes it faster
> and more probable.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinf
📝 Original message:No,Bitcoin
发自我的 iPhone
> 在 2015年6月16日，13:28，justusranvier at riseup.net 写道：
>
>> On 2015-06-16 03:49, Kevin Greene wrote:
>> Hah, fair enough, there is no such thing as the "right" way to do
>> anything. But I still think punishing users who use SPV wallets is a
>> less-than-ideal way to incentive people to run full nodes. Right now
>> SPV is
>> the best way that exists for mobile phones to participate in the
>> network in
>> a decentralized way. This proposal makes the user experience for mobile
>> wallets a little more confusing and annoying.
>
> Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. Who
> would provide the nodes they would need connect to? The decentralization
> fairy?
>
> There's absolutely no reason that paying for connectivity would be any
> more confusing or annoying than transaction fees are.
>
> If some full nodes in the network started offering paid connection
> slots, that would just mean that users who checked the "pay subscription
> fee" box in their wallet configuration would have an easier time
> connecting than the users who did't, just like how your transaction
> might eventually get mined without a fee but paying one makes it faster
> and more probable.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinf