vinney on Nostr: I'm now knowledgeable on the details, but that sounds right. Essentially you're ...
I'm now knowledgeable on the details, but that sounds right. Essentially you're saying there should never be a "cannot zap, no wallet" message from a client, because lack of a LUD16 should fallback to NIP-60.
Even before that, though, it seems most clients don't even provide a mechanism to *opt* to zap to NIP60, right?
Published at
2025-02-05 19:33:09Event JSON
{
"id": "c114f3961133da94ae9fcc26100de7dc788ef876e73a71901f3ec8ba4b1ff7e7",
"pubkey": "2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331",
"created_at": 1738783989,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1506dc10645cfc1bf896ebe87837ed31cca848c4c514f835b4602644871f1530",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"65d12d17920f1ee1b51a91e7c1ed0fac8105c66f3aea518d2ba3bed74f606857"
],
[
"e",
"d5d22e132af79b4b67c49875a2ca2c29ed5f1685f62339e70c8204cca56ff537",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"50d94fc2d8580c682b071a542f8b1e31a200b0508bab95a33bef0855df281d63"
],
[
"p",
"2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331"
],
[
"p",
"c8383d81dd24406745b68409be40d6721c301029464067fcc50a25ddf9139549"
]
],
"content": "I'm now knowledgeable on the details, but that sounds right. Essentially you're saying there should never be a \"cannot zap, no wallet\" message from a client, because lack of a LUD16 should fallback to NIP-60. \n\nEven before that, though, it seems most clients don't even provide a mechanism to *opt* to zap to NIP60, right? ",
"sig": "36c5365a5a80b8c3526a8ca93a1b65daca18e1dec14bc7ee1276ffc22b91708af17ae653ff38fa8483de9aece71279f793bcf0573c9487990e907fd83c51cffe"
}
