Weatherall on Nostr: 1) Marbury v Madison: constitutional right is supreme over state law 2) and 3) are in ...
1) Marbury v Madison: constitutional right is supreme over state law
2) and 3) are in your photo
4) US v Bishop 412 US 346: sets standard for what constitutes a violation in terms of willful intent.
The above represent a bonafide constitutional and Supreme Court precedented argument for the violation of ANY constitutional right.
Ask yourself:
1) What constitutional right. Prove it.
2) State doesnt have right to convert that right to a privilege.
3) They cannot punish if they do attempt to convert if you choose to ignore it
4) Claim prosecuter cannot prove "willful intent"
5) Demand dismissal and ask for cost and fees for a frivilous and spurious lawsuit.
You have a RIGHT TO WORK and CONTRACT how you see fit to make a living.
You have a RIGHT TO TRAVEL unimpeded.
You have a RIGHT TO PRACTICE LAW WITHOUT A LICENSE.
- Once you win your case, sue them.
2) and 3) are in your photo
4) US v Bishop 412 US 346: sets standard for what constitutes a violation in terms of willful intent.
The above represent a bonafide constitutional and Supreme Court precedented argument for the violation of ANY constitutional right.
Ask yourself:
1) What constitutional right. Prove it.
2) State doesnt have right to convert that right to a privilege.
3) They cannot punish if they do attempt to convert if you choose to ignore it
4) Claim prosecuter cannot prove "willful intent"
5) Demand dismissal and ask for cost and fees for a frivilous and spurious lawsuit.
You have a RIGHT TO WORK and CONTRACT how you see fit to make a living.
You have a RIGHT TO TRAVEL unimpeded.
You have a RIGHT TO PRACTICE LAW WITHOUT A LICENSE.
- Once you win your case, sue them.
quoting note1pae…z4uv🤔 hmm…
