Steve Bellovin on Nostr: An interesting unanimous, per curiam opinion from the Supreme Court upholding the law ...
An interesting unanimous, per curiam opinion from the Supreme Court upholding the law banning TikTok. The Court felt that intermediate scrutiny was the right standard to use, under which the law was constitutional; Sotomayor and probably Gorsuch felt that it should have been strict scrutiny, but that that standard was met, too. (Gorsuch had a bunch of other concerns I won't try to summarize.)
Published at
2025-01-17 15:44:35Event JSON
{
"id": "c25191c9c8f10e85d95e4afcbae951afff6a850dcf383bbc240b154bf34403e7",
"pubkey": "1ace68472745b2642934c6172c5994f5f094f01deb752145d25225e637a87a50",
"created_at": 1737128675,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://infosec.exchange/users/SteveBellovin/statuses/113844464887142514",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "An interesting unanimous, per curiam opinion from the Supreme Court upholding the law banning TikTok. The Court felt that intermediate scrutiny was the right standard to use, under which the law was constitutional; Sotomayor and probably Gorsuch felt that it should have been strict scrutiny, but that that standard was met, too. (Gorsuch had a bunch of other concerns I won't try to summarize.)",
"sig": "3f0caa7b82abd26194b7374b19ec56dd29b8cb9d7420017253122245f64a067220047ef342df900026c4ee0dfbc7d2d1967c0f69c56e85a7bf182349d6e6c4b8"
}
