What is Nostr?
sooly / Sooly Kobayashi
npub1hzz…nqel
2025-01-20 16:28:07

sooly on Nostr: 🔥 Yet another embarrassment for the DOJ in the Tornado Cash case exposed by L0la ...

🔥 Yet another embarrassment for the DOJ in the Tornado Cash case exposed by L0la L33tz (nprofile…3ljd)

The logic here? Utterly dystopian. Imagine holding toolmakers responsible for every misuse of their tools. By this standard, Ford is liable for getaway cars, and Apple for hacked Macs.

Let’s not forget: Tornado Cash implemented sanctions oracles to block OFAC-listed entities. But no, the Government waves this off as "window dressing," while insisting the sole purpose of #TornadoCash was criminality—even though their own data shows only 14% illicit usage.

And now, the developers? Being charged for creating an interface. It’s #FATF recommendation 66 on steroids, with zero regard for #FinCEN guidance or actual adoption.

This isn’t law enforcement—it’s a desperate attempt to criminalize open-source innovation. 🚨 A warning shot to every dev in #crypto: your code isn’t safe from centralized overreach.

If these actions stand, the consequences for privacy, technology, and innovation will be catastrophic. This isn’t just about Tornado Cash—it’s about the future of freedom in a digital age.

Wake up babe, there's a new filing in Tornado Cash, and it's just about as embarrassing as the rest of the shitshow the DOJ has been assembling over the past two years 👇

This time, it persists that Storm profited from Tornado Cash smart contracts, arguing directly against arguments made by the Fifth Circuit, which found that "none of the immutable smart contracts entitle the smart-contract creators to a benefit."

Imagine a car manufacturer being held liable for profiting from illicit activity because a car they manufactured was used in a bank robbery, or a computer manufacturer because a machine they sold was used in a hack.

Tornado Cash should have stopped illicit activity, even though we concede that Tornado Cash couldn't stop illicit activity, or so the argument goes.

What about the Chainalysis sanctions oracle Tornado Cash implemented to block OFAC listed entities from accessing the service?

That's "window dressing," the Government says – an inefficient step that was only taken to "make a public announcement that TC wasn't violating the law." OK then.

The Government continues to appear to allege that the sole purpose of Tornado Cash was to enable criminal transactions, again making references to the prosecution of Silk Road operator Ross Ulbricht – ignoring the fact that while Silk Road operated as a dark net market, Tornado Cash illicit transactions are only estimated to have made up around 14% of overall activity be the Government's own calculations, primarily pertaining to funds originating from hacks.

What's worse is that the Government doubles down on charging the developers for the development of a User Interface, continuing to attempt to enforce FATF recommendation 66 against FinCEN guidance and despite the lack of official adoption.

This case is a complete abomination of the US justice system. Everyone working on its prosecution should be fired.

https://www.therage.co/doj-tornado-cash-motion-to-dismiss/
Author Public Key
npub1hzz35pkl67w53lpj2g62zh56g63j5zvz4q3m2nxlsfg5hxcjpwssaynqel