Thanks for bringing privacy to the forefront. Few read the respective nostr github ...

npub1zaf…26k5

2024-01-22 14:41:57

in reply to nevent1q…0q7j

Thanks for bringing privacy to the forefront. Few read the respective nostr github project documentation on privacy. Your method of exposing privacy on base nostr protocol has been effective.

> hardly any moderation tools

Despite this, the discourse is more civil than that of twtr. Maybe it’s a function of nostr’s tiny size, and lack of algos.

Rabble (npub1wmr…g240) and nos social are as far as I’m aware thinking and developing most on moderation tools.

I don’t know how far they’ve gotten - that said one of the benefits of nostr is you don’t have a mandatory moderation curator in a WEF stooge. You can have a feature where you choose your own moderator - for instance you can choose Jack.

Martti Malmi (npub1g53…drvk) implemented web of trust network hops filter more than half a year ago on Iris messenger.

> no centralized development
Yes, this is a feature. Otherwise we’ll get another closed big tech gulag.

You are more than welcome to submit PRs to Damus, and I’m sure many others will happily review patches. Nearly all of nostr is FOSS, and lead devs welcome patches.

Example code and issues https://github.com/damus-io/damus

Author Public Key

npub1zafcms4xya5ap9zr7xxr0jlrtrattwlesytn2s42030lzu0dwlzqpd26k5

Show more details

Published at

2024-01-22 14:41:57

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "c677ce0728d7ea71b07d92be5b9989153d5d542be8bb98e83b1047aaa48d94b9", "pubkey": "17538dc2a62769d09443f18c37cbe358fab5bbf981173542aa7c5ff171ed77c4", "created_at": 1705934517, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "276298c53aa2984bb8310d98907891a4b86a9c8cffd05996ccb915c7f0498f70" ], [ "p", "703533c2c16ac7771efb1bdf60a85df74e42f8409a007900f402ba4684f99184" ], [ "p", "76c71aae3a491f1d9eec47cba17e229cda4113a0bbb6e6ae1776d7643e29cafa" ], [ "p", "4523be58d395b1b196a9b8c82b038b6895cb02b683d0c253a955068dba1facd0" ], [ "r", "https://github.com/damus-io/damus" ] ], "content": "Thanks for bringing privacy to the forefront. Few read the respective nostr github project documentation on privacy. Your method of exposing privacy on base nostr protocol has been effective.\n\n\u003e hardly any moderation tools\n\nDespite this, the discourse is more civil than that of twtr. Maybe it’s a function of nostr’s tiny size, and lack of algos.\n\nnostr:npub1wmr34t36fy03m8hvgl96zl3znndyzyaqhwmwdtshwmtkg03fetaqhjg240 and nos social are as far as I’m aware thinking and developing most on moderation tools. \n\nI don’t know how far they’ve gotten - that said one of the benefits of nostr is you don’t have a mandatory moderation curator in a WEF stooge. You can have a feature where you choose your own moderator - for instance you can choose Jack. \n\nnostr:npub1g53mukxnjkcmr94fhryzkqutdz2ukq4ks0gvy5af25rgmwsl4ngq43drvk implemented web of trust network hops filter more than half a year ago on Iris messenger. \n\n\u003e no centralized development \nYes, this is a feature. Otherwise we’ll get another closed big tech gulag. \n\nYou are more than welcome to submit PRs to Damus, and I’m sure many others will happily review patches. Nearly all of nostr is FOSS, and lead devs welcome patches.\n\nExample code and issues https://github.com/damus-io/damus", "sig": "4a6962b96379505d0a0652c34796d538b69846e63d29d44cfa6daaa561d5b07395f6d45aedceb97c90a100046bdeddca6680542082c14331a8867a10562f7fdf" }