Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-07-18 📝 Original message:> The 90 minutes is not - ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-07-18
📝 Original message:> The 90 minutes is not - the blockchain has grown quite a lot since last
> year, and as for the 3.5 speed, I havn't tested it since Pieter's
> ultraprune - libcoin also has something similar to ultraprune, done
> directly in the sqlite database backend, but I should run a head to head
> again - could be fun. I would assume, though, that the result would be
> similar timings.
>
ultraprune made a huge difference. I think it's very likely that this claim
is no longer true. Bitcoin got a lot more optimised since you first did
libcoin.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130718/b1a0212b/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:> The 90 minutes is not - the blockchain has grown quite a lot since last
> year, and as for the 3.5 speed, I havn't tested it since Pieter's
> ultraprune - libcoin also has something similar to ultraprune, done
> directly in the sqlite database backend, but I should run a head to head
> again - could be fun. I would assume, though, that the result would be
> similar timings.
>
ultraprune made a huge difference. I think it's very likely that this claim
is no longer true. Bitcoin got a lot more optimised since you first did
libcoin.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130718/b1a0212b/attachment.html>