ailepet on Nostr: Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: npub1sg4rc…7xslc Sincere question though, what is ...
Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (npub1ysu…2jyl) npub1sg4rcvkxkp3sx7f0ex8rtdd9ylcdd2fchtfm22fy45h4w02p306qq7xslc (npub1sg4…xslc) Sincere question though, what is the expectation of the "ecosystem" there? Should any given Linux GUI app adapt its UX to the desktop environment it is launched upon? Is it how non-GNOME apps actually behave?
On a broader note, I'm taken aback by how the discourse around GNOME is still so violent. Just after seeing this post, I'm reading stuff like "completely screw over everyone else", "baffling that people actively choose to use it", "fucking lazyness from the devs" and "whoever's making GTK4 is just bad at programming and should do something else with their life", and as a GNOME user and a friend of some of those devs, I fail to understand what's causing all this hostility. There's a lot of fine desktop environments out there, which theoretically should not be affected by the choices made in GNOME and libadwaita, so how do we keep depicting GNOME as a complete failure, written by fools and useless to normal people, apalling to the point of threatening the entire Linux ecosystem?
On a broader note, I'm taken aback by how the discourse around GNOME is still so violent. Just after seeing this post, I'm reading stuff like "completely screw over everyone else", "baffling that people actively choose to use it", "fucking lazyness from the devs" and "whoever's making GTK4 is just bad at programming and should do something else with their life", and as a GNOME user and a friend of some of those devs, I fail to understand what's causing all this hostility. There's a lot of fine desktop environments out there, which theoretically should not be affected by the choices made in GNOME and libadwaita, so how do we keep depicting GNOME as a complete failure, written by fools and useless to normal people, apalling to the point of threatening the entire Linux ecosystem?