Michael on Nostr: Here's a Schedule A case with a npub1ulmk7…whweg pet peeve. You can't get § 289 ...
Published at
2023-09-05 15:02:52Event JSON
{
"id": "c5a46f8067fdfef5a73daf817f54b4dfc3f12f654057ff3741fbf6eceb59370d",
"pubkey": "9ac6eb4507edc04bcb84a9c7b4069d49f05057b44a1f33e3ac938e0d183d0f6c",
"created_at": 1693926172,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e7f76f0d1fdf887c12cbf5eaf15dd3bb0b88f806051739f63200aae91a8a734e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mstdn.social/users/sqfreak/statuses/111013145628064375",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Here's a Schedule A case with a nostr:npub1ulmk7rglm7y8cykt7h40zhwnhv9c37qxq5tnna3jqz4wjx52wd8q2whweg pet peeve. You can't get § 289 total profits on a utility patent case, and pleading it should be Rule 11 territory. All you have to do is read the statute. *XYZ Corp. v. Schedule A*, No. 23-cv-23380 (S.D. Fla. filed Sept. 4, 2023).\n\nhttps://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/111/013/118/133/553/127/original/8139a89f3d4a8e01.png\n\nhttps://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/111/013/119/283/998/902/original/dc5348b629c9f4c0.png\n\nhttps://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/111/013/145/103/584/110/original/fc80de0412b9ef60.png",
"sig": "b81457e1d8023542817742e5393e8226d585b2823510d4dccffa4d1009c0aa14a03a92459819e358ba5567f4251ff3e68282536d201225c66f5d0c00fa4dca2e"
}