Dan Goodman on Nostr: npub1g9lm9…875lx what about the papers where a one line review is enough (e.g. the ...

npub1g9lm9wzy9mllzux4ehxrj43ptng5w0nrcq3cea676fj3m7klt8tq0875lx (npub1g9l…75lx) what about the papers where a one line review is enough (e.g. the paper was rejected somewhere else and the authors fixed all the problems)? Do you insist that they find some new issues that the authors have to respond to? And how do you propose to spot reviews done by ChatGPT? Is the point just to increase the power and leverage of editors? If so, that's a move in exactly the wrong direction. We already have too many power imbalances and avenues for potential abuse of power: we don't need to add more, we need to get rid of some. More carrot, less stick.