steepdawn on Nostr: You assume the case where they'd want to single out a certain user. It's much more ...
You assume the case where they'd want to single out a certain user.
It's much more likely they would (have to) apply much more broad/global action - such as enforcing authentication for *all user*. Or suspending Lightning swaps for non authenticated users.
These mints are custodians, and this CASPs (crypto asset service providers)/money transmitters etc under virtually any jurisdiction - who are under these rules required to KYC.
So it's just logical that Marty's asking the state for permission to let them operate. Because by the letter of the law, these mints would not be allowed to operate the way they do now.
It's much more likely they would (have to) apply much more broad/global action - such as enforcing authentication for *all user*. Or suspending Lightning swaps for non authenticated users.
These mints are custodians, and this CASPs (crypto asset service providers)/money transmitters etc under virtually any jurisdiction - who are under these rules required to KYC.
So it's just logical that Marty's asking the state for permission to let them operate. Because by the letter of the law, these mints would not be allowed to operate the way they do now.