Jordan on Nostr: If the theory of government is to work as a third party in the formation of contracts ...

If the theory of government is to work as a third party in the formation of contracts then it is not fair for a government to intervene to make sure the terms of the contract are clear.

Buying a product; indirectly is a contract, so consumers should be informed of the contract they are agreeing to when purchasing, utilizing, or consuming a product.

Personally, I think Surgeon General Warnings on Cigarettes, and The Truth in lending Act are both legitimate roles of the government as a mediator of contracts.