Sarah Burstein on Nostr: In this #ScheduleA case, Floatup (represented by Doniger / Burroughs) asserts a ...
In this #ScheduleA case, Floatup (represented by Doniger / Burroughs) asserts a utility patent, but calls--and treats it like--a design patent:
https://www.scribd.com/document/699275045/Floatup-v-Schedule-A-Motion-for-TRO-sans-exhibits
It is not. https://patents.google.com/patent/US11794860B1/en?oq=11%2c794%2c860
#UtilityPatents #ImproperDisgorgementDemands
https://www.scribd.com/document/699275045/Floatup-v-Schedule-A-Motion-for-TRO-sans-exhibits
It is not. https://patents.google.com/patent/US11794860B1/en?oq=11%2c794%2c860
#UtilityPatents #ImproperDisgorgementDemands