Event JSON
{
"id": "cb102bce71d33913d81e7b3ce6a67ad28f1897c566bceea87afafb77b95c6144",
"pubkey": "c5051b46c190db7d9b462748b2e3b76ebff27ee2284632fdcd413738af11e65c",
"created_at": 1697881220,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"ad951bfdf8f75f9c42aa74da8322bff38accbe325b7e8a9eec916226ac0ac24a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"dfd7b128bbb1222873eca016c1411fa7037a2d3b71dc0bf736480db54d3a61c3",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"e8948af386cc53f3a76a7d1baac09753c15d20a2f3c97b71d26c0e1e2d629671",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"t",
"weather"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://social.linux.pizza/users/mkj/statuses/111272343677257802",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub14k23hl0c7a0ecs42wndgxg4l7w9ve03jtdlg48hvj93zdtq2cf9q3ted68 The term \"100 year \u003cweather event\u003e\" (and similar ones for different time periods) somewhat bug me. Maybe because it carries the implied promise that \"it has now happened, we won't get another like it for 100 years\". I don't really have a good alternative to suggest, but I do think that we need to start thinking about how to describe weather events in terms that don't imply a future rate. That it's often qualified with \"we'll see more 100year \u003cevents\u003e\" should be indicative. #weather",
"sig": "45d368deef2d9cb61b77ced413296d2acca8032f6cc95445008637087f36a4ad92107b1e265f6eb83dd64d5b9038f30bb4a90375f5f9d94f2b1cc4426cbc9995"
}