Fierillo on Nostr: With all the Ordinals/Inscriptions polemic the flaws of segwit come to light. I ...
With all the Ordinals/Inscriptions polemic the flaws of segwit come to light.
I understand that with segwit discount removal the incentive to decrease the UTXO set disappear but currently the UTXO set is increasing and only weight about 5 GB
I dont think this compensate the unfairness of upload a dick pic with a 75% discount.
Also i understand the malleability problem but if my knowledge is right this problem is ECDSA based and thanks to taproot upgrade we started to use schnorr signatures so the malleability problem is not an issue anymore.
So the segwit discount becomes even more unnecesary.
I dont care about the ordinals, i think that in a permisionless network everybody can upload the info that want if pay the price, my problem is there is some data that gets 75% discount and thats unfair.
What do you think?
I understand that with segwit discount removal the incentive to decrease the UTXO set disappear but currently the UTXO set is increasing and only weight about 5 GB
I dont think this compensate the unfairness of upload a dick pic with a 75% discount.
Also i understand the malleability problem but if my knowledge is right this problem is ECDSA based and thanks to taproot upgrade we started to use schnorr signatures so the malleability problem is not an issue anymore.
So the segwit discount becomes even more unnecesary.
I dont care about the ordinals, i think that in a permisionless network everybody can upload the info that want if pay the price, my problem is there is some data that gets 75% discount and thats unfair.
What do you think?