regenerate on Nostr: I say "abolish," not "defund," because if you say "defund," you invite someone to ask ...
I say "abolish," not "defund," because if you say "defund," you invite someone to ask "by how much?" Pretty soon they're worrying aloud that reducing police budgets by 10% might be too extreme; how about 7%? No, 3% would be more prudent, but phase it in over 5 years--and the discussion goes wonky, people tune out, nobody cares because there's always a new issue coming down the pike in this hellscape anyhow, and this particular issue has now been deemed "too complicated."
It's more difficult to do that with "abolish," though I have seen people try.
Published at
2024-09-17 06:52:38Event JSON
{
"id": "cbf1477047a4e92fee49c363f87bc97ec6a4bf2f7e87c89333643df4855e534d",
"pubkey": "403a88f90ff29c40eb84813aab741a653d0b6db4a299fd543c1102ddc369748b",
"created_at": 1726555958,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://kolektiva.social/@regenerate/113151571323522491",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://kolektiva.social/users/regenerate/statuses/113151571323522491",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://kolektiva.social/users/regenerate/statuses/113151571323522491",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "I say \"abolish,\" not \"defund,\" because if you say \"defund,\" you invite someone to ask \"by how much?\" Pretty soon they're worrying aloud that reducing police budgets by 10% might be too extreme; how about 7%? No, 3% would be more prudent, but phase it in over 5 years--and the discussion goes wonky, people tune out, nobody cares because there's always a new issue coming down the pike in this hellscape anyhow, and this particular issue has now been deemed \"too complicated.\"\n\nIt's more difficult to do that with \"abolish,\" though I have seen people try.",
"sig": "15a1c462c81e3beb4fbaafc882626ed1c8486e4aad6d21962dee0b3cc95f5a34969675c5d76e7dbd47bbcdd93e4b6fd56ea7bb23a4b30d067f8dc477dcfa0455"
}