petersuber on Nostr: This critique of #preprints assumes that because they are not subject to conventional ...
This critique of #preprints assumes that because they are not subject to conventional pre-publication peer review, they are not subject to any kind of peer review. It shows no awareness of the many kinds of open and post-publication peer review, or even the pre-publication vetting (not equivalent to peer review) done at many preprint repositories.
https://www.structuralheartjournal.org/article/S2474-8706(23)00089-1/fulltext#PeerReview
Published at
2023-08-06 13:12:48Event JSON
{
"id": "c495a66eadad688ecc25d3241be48af4ec3e613f6cf6fb6e3b32d28b1e8aafd7",
"pubkey": "4a5549958eafeb0c61062f37a8a33988f42b85ec9b14c51bfcfce9b3bf13d7fc",
"created_at": 1691327568,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"PeerReview"
],
[
"t",
"preprints"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://fediscience.org/users/petersuber/statuses/110842843513702613",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "This critique of #preprints assumes that because they are not subject to conventional pre-publication peer review, they are not subject to any kind of peer review. It shows no awareness of the many kinds of open and post-publication peer review, or even the pre-publication vetting (not equivalent to peer review) done at many preprint repositories.\nhttps://www.structuralheartjournal.org/article/S2474-8706(23)00089-1/fulltext\n\n#PeerReview",
"sig": "6bed19ddfa487c4bea07a66db91393c918e255c34d2c588f9a84e268e0af21139c324389229aab3b86b58bd3efb460371556acdc441da38883d0922d98173fd4"
}
