Event JSON
{
"id": "cc938b3a3792975f64deb3dee4c58ed163ed7c4de71d21b76b8d37607ff5cb86",
"pubkey": "1a86cdd0b8937f3bc4b01609db847e7487f317a09ad04c5bd7cc9316c00e801e",
"created_at": 1720273484,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"1a86cdd0b8937f3bc4b01609db847e7487f317a09ad04c5bd7cc9316c00e801e"
],
[
"e",
"7c2f544380779d1edb0569036937c1250dad64126e17eb117944a976835a05cf",
"",
"root"
],
[
"t",
"trump"
],
[
"e",
"e5eaa6148b0cda4b2cb206dfd603fe1bb2bfe8a27ee26ed9a55c94155dcac20a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"t",
"authoritarianism"
],
[
"t",
"project2025"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://toad.social/@wdlindsy/112739843096821017",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://toad.social/users/wdlindsy/statuses/112739843096821017",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://toad.social/users/wdlindsy/statuses/112739843096821017",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"expiration",
"1722871691"
]
],
"content": "\"Project 2025 doesn’t contain overt references to Trump. In that regard, it reminds me of the Supreme Court’s opinion in the immunity appeal, Trump v. U.S. The Court pretended it was writing rules for theoretical future presidents. They tried to divorce their decision from the reality that it could let Donald Trump, whom they dismissed without naming him as 'present exigencies,' escape from his effort to overturn the election with no consequences.\"\n\n#Trump #Project2025 #authoritarianism \n/6",
"sig": "0106adf9f97be0caa2b23c585d8a7fcf5c4d83c0cd039473a0d31dbe74e4cdb2662e0aefd8927a754ecd73dd8c171ae2ab882896682038bcbd5ce2ce0545ce2a"
}
