d4tis on Nostr: I know as #Bitcoin becomes more widespread there will be a lot less wholecoiners ...
I know as #Bitcoin becomes more widespread there will be a lot less wholecoiners relative to users, but are they supposed to write
₿ 100,000,000
to represent 1 whole Bitcoin?
This seems cumbersome. Surely sats should have their own symbol, which would be Bitcoin's version of the ¢ symbol.
Personally I like ϟ
Published at
2024-02-16 10:37:01Event JSON
{
"id": "ccbc341d3fd0552e6693038f3f2b5a17af642402be08a616a314d555d9968855",
"pubkey": "c194e5f2af0f2a6171e0de04fdd93c0c7963e8225cec4958119a46545d86c94d",
"created_at": 1708079821,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d639030dc363941f41720aad65fd45d20c5c9d0f8fa2ffde3d6ed105c7c2c14f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"4657dfe8965be8980a93072bcfb5e59a65124406db0f819215ee78ba47934b3e"
],
[
"t",
"Bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
]
],
"content": "I know as #Bitcoin becomes more widespread there will be a lot less wholecoiners relative to users, but are they supposed to write \n\n₿ 100,000,000\n\nto represent 1 whole Bitcoin? \n\nThis seems cumbersome. Surely sats should have their own symbol, which would be Bitcoin's version of the ¢ symbol. \n\nPersonally I like ϟ\n",
"sig": "f247974ed4365047be1c1b8fc3ae09fdef5955d7d1a24569cb743ef7261f03a3d0bc8bde0d03f2bc93c62e5769f6da9a1d02223298c6a601b2660f6fcea97bcf"
}
