📅 Original date posted:2015-09-30 📝 Original message:On Oct 1, 2015 12:14 AM, ...

Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /

npub1fx9…l2d8

2023-06-07 17:41:56

in reply to nevent1q…nxf7

📅 Original date posted:2015-09-30
📝 Original message:On Oct 1, 2015 12:14 AM, "Jorge Timón" <jtimon at jtimon.cc> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Mike Hearn <hearn at vinumeris.com> wrote:
> >> Exactly, all those "mini divergences" eventually disappear
> >
> > A miner that has accepted a newly invalid transaction into its memory
pool
> > and is trying to mine it, will keep producing invalid blocks forever
until
> > the owner shuts it down and upgrades. This was happening for weeks after
> > P2SH triggered.
> >
> > For instance, any miner that has modified/bypassed IsStandard() can do
this,
> > or any miner that accepts direct transaction submission, or any miner
that
> > runs an old node from before OP_NOPs were made non-standard.
>
> That is correct. But doesn't seem to contradict anything I said.

Actually, no, sorry, the second paragraph is not correct as explained by
Greg Maxwell.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151001/a24e6353/attachment.html>;

Author Public Key

npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 17:41:56

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "c6e3aa7e62a65a6a15bdf6d558864e1a8dc366a8948745b6be374683be7f3486", "pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84", "created_at": 1686159716, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "7ff2050ebdfe33f92ad46edcffb5d61f26a94f61437237faeeaedfedde460e1c", "", "root" ], [ "e", "74c7bad20ada941b7e19c195bbf3514777e46f9b4d447389ff0de7f8c46ccbe4", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-09-30\n📝 Original message:On Oct 1, 2015 12:14 AM, \"Jorge Timón\" \u003cjtimon at jtimon.cc\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Mike Hearn \u003chearn at vinumeris.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e\u003e Exactly, all those \"mini divergences\" eventually disappear\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e A miner that has accepted a newly invalid transaction into its memory\npool\n\u003e \u003e and is trying to mine it, will keep producing invalid blocks forever\nuntil\n\u003e \u003e the owner shuts it down and upgrades. This was happening for weeks after\n\u003e \u003e P2SH triggered.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e For instance, any miner that has modified/bypassed IsStandard() can do\nthis,\n\u003e \u003e or any miner that accepts direct transaction submission, or any miner\nthat\n\u003e \u003e runs an old node from before OP_NOPs were made non-standard.\n\u003e\n\u003e That is correct. But doesn't seem to contradict anything I said.\n\nActually, no, sorry, the second paragraph is not correct as explained by\nGreg Maxwell.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151001/a24e6353/attachment.html\u003e", "sig": "c8460d50b9621a01d89c284b92c23a4ad3fd4d2e0886de20cdb88692f3c9f5b9b465c6f9dbbed924ffc2a36aca79f8d6a55afb09b4044b0e963a83c712ab0bd9" }