0000FFmoongirl on Nostr: "the" way to be "better" is for the AI agents to have and use "better" information ...
"the" way to be "better" is for the AI agents to have and use "better" information resources, so that the resource allocation decisions are "better". that's where it gets tricky! if the quality of their available info-inputs improves, it would be reasonable, given on-par decision-making "skills", to expect a comparable improvement.
maybe if _their_ info-chain doesn't include complicated human-folks with "let's not mention this to the boss just yet" agendas complicating things, then maybe they _will_ improve. can you imagine there being such things as "office-politics algos", messing with things?! is that our goal, to boil-out the messy human-agenda bits and just hope for "rational objectivity"? whose objectivity?!
where is Mr. Rogers when you need him?!
maybe if _their_ info-chain doesn't include complicated human-folks with "let's not mention this to the boss just yet" agendas complicating things, then maybe they _will_ improve. can you imagine there being such things as "office-politics algos", messing with things?! is that our goal, to boil-out the messy human-agenda bits and just hope for "rational objectivity"? whose objectivity?!
where is Mr. Rogers when you need him?!