Robert Spigler [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2021-03-18 📝 Original message:(IMO), where this proposal ...

📅 Original date posted:2021-03-18
📝 Original message:(IMO), where this proposal really excels, is mutlisig. And if you check my commits, it actually originally was for multisig only, and I extended it for multisig and single sig wallets.

ghost43 and Jochen Hoenicke brought up important issues with this proposed BIP re: single sig wallets, so I will be reverting this back for multisig derivations. I believe that should cover all concerns.

Please view the updated BIP here: https://github.com/Rspigler/bips-1/blob/Sane_Mulitisg_deriv/Modern%20Hierarchy%20for%20Deterministic%20Multisignature%20Wallets.mediawiki

And the updated PR here: https://github.com/Rspigler/bips-1/pull/1

Thank you,

Robert

Personal Fingerprint: BF0D 3C08 A439 5AC6 11C1 5395 B70B 4A77 F850 548F

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, March 18, 2021 4:44 PM, Robert Spigler via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> I (Robert Spigler) will respond in a next post.
>
> Thanks for your comments!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210318/eb5bd6d3/attachment.html>;