npub1z9…g7jc5 on Nostr: npub1pu6zu…au9fd there seems to be a misrepresentation about what he said. ...
npub1pu6zualylf5ut8hz9el6kzmng946wty843g7qyn6d8mc999pmrkqwau9fd (npub1pu6…u9fd) there seems to be a misrepresentation about what he said.
According to the article, he didn’t say this was a legal requirement, but would have been politically preferable.
It doesn’t mean the vote wasn’t valid or constitutional. It means the vote wasn’t the politically palatable way to go.
He’s saying future votes should learn from the experience and go the politically preferable way with the higher threshold.
According to the article, he didn’t say this was a legal requirement, but would have been politically preferable.
It doesn’t mean the vote wasn’t valid or constitutional. It means the vote wasn’t the politically palatable way to go.
He’s saying future votes should learn from the experience and go the politically preferable way with the higher threshold.