Douglas Huff [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-08-22 🗒️ Summary of this message: A discussion on ...
📅 Original date posted:2011-08-22
🗒️ Summary of this message: A discussion on daemonizing Bitcoin on boot and integrating it with standard coding and implementation paradigms on GNU/Linux platforms.
📝 Original message:I don't think you're actually familiar with either of those tools. A run
script is not much different than an init script?
Those who live in tonal caves shouldn't crap on themselves, or something.
On Aug 22, 2011 2:49 PM, "Luke-Jr" <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
>
> On Monday, August 22, 2011 3:30:04 PM Douglas Huff wrote:
> > On Aug 22, 2011 2:26 PM, "Fred Concklin" <fconcklin at trucoin.com> wrote:
> > > I'm also interested in work to daemonize bitcoin on boot and
furthering
> > > work to bring bitcoin into general coding and implementation paradigms
> > > seen on GNU/Linux platforms.
> >
> > What? It already works fine in this regard using standard tools.
Especially
> > easy with daemontools/runit.
>
> He said standard *coding and implementation paradigms*. This has nothing
to do
> with integration with some non-standard "init replacement" that goes
against
> the whole design of Unix.
>
> What I understand this to mean, is properly abstracting the components
such
> that the node, wallet, and GUI can work together while being distinct
parts.
> In this sense, Fred, you may be interested in working on coming up with a
> standard for a https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Wallet_protocol
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110822/cdad2324/attachment.html>
🗒️ Summary of this message: A discussion on daemonizing Bitcoin on boot and integrating it with standard coding and implementation paradigms on GNU/Linux platforms.
📝 Original message:I don't think you're actually familiar with either of those tools. A run
script is not much different than an init script?
Those who live in tonal caves shouldn't crap on themselves, or something.
On Aug 22, 2011 2:49 PM, "Luke-Jr" <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
>
> On Monday, August 22, 2011 3:30:04 PM Douglas Huff wrote:
> > On Aug 22, 2011 2:26 PM, "Fred Concklin" <fconcklin at trucoin.com> wrote:
> > > I'm also interested in work to daemonize bitcoin on boot and
furthering
> > > work to bring bitcoin into general coding and implementation paradigms
> > > seen on GNU/Linux platforms.
> >
> > What? It already works fine in this regard using standard tools.
Especially
> > easy with daemontools/runit.
>
> He said standard *coding and implementation paradigms*. This has nothing
to do
> with integration with some non-standard "init replacement" that goes
against
> the whole design of Unix.
>
> What I understand this to mean, is properly abstracting the components
such
> that the node, wallet, and GUI can work together while being distinct
parts.
> In this sense, Fred, you may be interested in working on coming up with a
> standard for a https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Wallet_protocol
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110822/cdad2324/attachment.html>