Riku Mattila :verified: on Nostr: My somewhat heretic view is that with a few exceptions, failure tolerance is more ...
My somewhat heretic view is that with a few exceptions, failure tolerance is more important for safety than high quality. If the system is designed right, bad quality is primarily a usability issue, not a safety issue.
Consequently, there is very little actual need for specially nuclear-qualified components.
Published at
2024-03-09 11:02:31Event JSON
{
"id": "ca67d4e106f686e2a0e04add07139e0bd1bc1bb68f0f59e1dfb754aa449e49fe",
"pubkey": "e4d5222dfd84d62c28bc75fd6287f1ef4e76c69fe02e4e14ee9b98a693b0cc90",
"created_at": 1709982151,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://energydon.fi/users/rmattila74/statuses/112065390285313750",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "My somewhat heretic view is that with a few exceptions, failure tolerance is more important for safety than high quality. If the system is designed right, bad quality is primarily a usability issue, not a safety issue. \n\nConsequently, there is very little actual need for specially nuclear-qualified components.",
"sig": "f0d6f659208fe3ede4de3f6c0a61c38901334c6cb599ae7e7b8127040c0255c67c80cc5e382239f4874598e15d59f65110d8ba56ded9d5c250f8be6c523b0a2d"
}
