Drak [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-02-28 📝 Original message:On 28 February 2014 14:42, ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-02-28
📝 Original message:On 28 February 2014 14:42, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d
>
> In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilobyte completely
> failed to account for the actual cost to the network. If Bitcoin had
> adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had no reason to join
> Litecoin development last year. This is one of the few economic design
> flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design.
>
Is there any particular reason that patch would not make it into bitcoin if
submitted?
Drak
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140228/c3739720/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:On 28 February 2014 14:42, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d
>
> In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilobyte completely
> failed to account for the actual cost to the network. If Bitcoin had
> adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had no reason to join
> Litecoin development last year. This is one of the few economic design
> flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design.
>
Is there any particular reason that patch would not make it into bitcoin if
submitted?
Drak
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140228/c3739720/attachment.html>