James O'Beirne [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2022-02-10 📝 Original message:> It's not that simple. As ...
📅 Original date posted:2022-02-10
📝 Original message:> It's not that simple. As a miner, if i have less than 1vMB of
transactions in my mempool. I don't want a 10sats/vb transaction paying
100000sats by a 100sats/vb transaction paying only 10000sats.
I don't understand why the "<1vMB in the mempool" case is even worth
consideration because the miner will just include the entire mempool in the
next block regardless of feerate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220210/58bee534/attachment-0001.html>
📝 Original message:> It's not that simple. As a miner, if i have less than 1vMB of
transactions in my mempool. I don't want a 10sats/vb transaction paying
100000sats by a 100sats/vb transaction paying only 10000sats.
I don't understand why the "<1vMB in the mempool" case is even worth
consideration because the miner will just include the entire mempool in the
next block regardless of feerate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220210/58bee534/attachment-0001.html>