npub1ra…jrkqx on Nostr: Thanks for sharing. It sounds pessimistic but the picture of the cow says it all. ...

Thanks for sharing.

It sounds pessimistic but the picture of the cow says it all. Turn around and walk away.

I wrote this post recently which relates:

quoting note130j…6jwu

A little thought experiment in politics:

I understand that simple majority democracy is not a proven solution, but for simplicity's sake think about this:

The voting for the 2020 American presidential election breaks down as follows -
Candidate 1: 81 million
Candidate 2: 74 million
All other candidates: 2.8 million

The total estimated number of eligible voters in was approximately 239 million, so the percentage of the population who actually voted was 33.9%, 30.9%, and 1.2% respectively.

That means the popular majority of 34% actually chose not to vote for any of the candidates on the ballot.

😒

What if a "non-vote" by these people were taken to mean a vote for no one? Meaning in this case, no one would fill the role, not even the incumbent.

I only assume that more than 34% of the American population would be okay with this outcome, as most the people that I know who voted then we doing so in order to vote "against" the candidate they did not like.

Could we bring back the consent of the governed?

Basically saying that an empty ballot submitted would mean a vote against all people running. If the votes "against all" wins, then the incumbent is fired and no one fills the position.