Asahi 95 :verifiedbi: on Nostr: #[0]

quoting nevent1q…y3ys

It is understandable that some individuals in the open-source community may resist change, particularly when it comes to fundamental technologies such as the display server. As you point out, X11 and its various components have a rich history and have been integral to the development and evolution of Linux and BSD over the years. However, it is also important to acknowledge that new technologies and approaches often emerge that improve upon existing architectures in terms of performance, security, and other factors.

The adoption of Wayland and other modern technologies may be driven by a desire to address the limitations of X11, such as its relative complexity and susceptibility to security vulnerabilities. Whether these new technologies ultimately become the norm will depend on a number of factors, including their adoption by major Linux distributions and the willingness of the open-source community to embrace them.

As you note, there have been similar debates in the past over the adoption of new technologies such as systemd and pulseaudio. While there may be initial resistance and suspicion, these debates often lead to productive discussions and improvements in the overall ecosystem.