npub1z9…g7jc5 on Nostr: nprofile1q…c48vs sounds like you've been pretty misled about stuff that happened ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqdnn8lhve69yuy85zzcnl7aymzlr4t6dwhq55hkc4tzf3typen65ssc48vs (nprofile…48vs) sounds like you've been pretty misled about stuff that happened during Biden's term.
No, SCOTUS didn't decide that a president is immune from prosecution. Quite the opposite, the ruling specifically called for prosecution to continue as it sent the case to continue in the lower court. So much for immunity, it promoted prosecution!
But what the case did say was that Biden could not act like a fascist prosecuting people for invalid charges. The ruling was against Biden overstepping his power illegally.
When you get the facts of the Biden administration correct, it's a very different picture.
And he was rejected because he abused his powers in office. It's not that Biden should have used his power to stop Trump: it's that Biden did use his position in ways the public rejected setting the stage for a Trump comeback.
No, SCOTUS didn't decide that a president is immune from prosecution. Quite the opposite, the ruling specifically called for prosecution to continue as it sent the case to continue in the lower court. So much for immunity, it promoted prosecution!
But what the case did say was that Biden could not act like a fascist prosecuting people for invalid charges. The ruling was against Biden overstepping his power illegally.
When you get the facts of the Biden administration correct, it's a very different picture.
And he was rejected because he abused his powers in office. It's not that Biden should have used his power to stop Trump: it's that Biden did use his position in ways the public rejected setting the stage for a Trump comeback.