Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-11-27 📝 Original message:Eric Lombrozo via ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-11-27
📝 Original message:Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes:
>>From an app developer's perspective, I think it is pretty blatantly
> clear that relative timelock is *the* critical exposed functionality
> intended here.
As someone who actually developed scripts using CSV, I agree with Mark
(and Matt). The relative locktime stuff isn't in this opcode, it's in
the nSequence calculation.
So, I vote to keep CSV called as it is.
Thanks,
Rusty.
📝 Original message:Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes:
>>From an app developer's perspective, I think it is pretty blatantly
> clear that relative timelock is *the* critical exposed functionality
> intended here.
As someone who actually developed scripts using CSV, I agree with Mark
(and Matt). The relative locktime stuff isn't in this opcode, it's in
the nSequence calculation.
So, I vote to keep CSV called as it is.
Thanks,
Rusty.