JohnJames on Nostr: Riiiiight… so you are calling a decade of voluntary consensus among miners and the ...
Riiiiight… so you are calling a decade of voluntary consensus among miners and the current functionality of Bitcoin core “centralization” (which it isn’t, why don’t you look up that definition in the dictionary), yet intentionally ignoring that consensus so you can censor whirlpool/paynym transactions and effectively attack Bitcoin Core, while pretending you are doing something positive for Bitcoin…
Nobody who actually digs into the details believes your lies. The normies might swallow your omissions and trust you just because @jack somehow doesn’t realize you’re using a custom fork to try and attack Bitcoin core… but we all know you’re full of 💩 and your Ocean pool will die a slow death. You are worse than the ordinals idiots, and you need to look in the mirror and recognize that you need to do better, and be better. Be a man, stop lying, admit you were wrong, get your shit together and use Bitcoin core, and actually do something good, like you claimed you would.
Nobody who actually digs into the details believes your lies. The normies might swallow your omissions and trust you just because @jack somehow doesn’t realize you’re using a custom fork to try and attack Bitcoin core… but we all know you’re full of 💩 and your Ocean pool will die a slow death. You are worse than the ordinals idiots, and you need to look in the mirror and recognize that you need to do better, and be better. Be a man, stop lying, admit you were wrong, get your shit together and use Bitcoin core, and actually do something good, like you claimed you would.