Ned Yeung on Nostr: npub1krl8s…acq5t npub1v4zx4…z48dt To be technical, the gay sex part was actually ...
npub1krl8slwgz3muya7fgvckffg8j6ej8ue3dgqeruwx5dp7q96v4ckspacq5t (npub1krl…cq5t) npub1v4zx4jzat3s2m4eulad60ul4fa977nya6jkdvzf8wtqmrtkzd9xsnz48dt (npub1v4z…48dt)
To be technical, the gay sex part was actually a misinterpretation introduced into translation and the mistake was realized after it had been widely published.
But even without that knowledge, the backflips they make to pick and choose parts of the old testament that they want to fit their hateful ideology is just as harmful. "Jesus wrote us a new testament of love, but we don't gaf what he said, we're picking out of old testament in his name." Using the Lord's name in vain?
To be technical, the gay sex part was actually a misinterpretation introduced into translation and the mistake was realized after it had been widely published.
But even without that knowledge, the backflips they make to pick and choose parts of the old testament that they want to fit their hateful ideology is just as harmful. "Jesus wrote us a new testament of love, but we don't gaf what he said, we're picking out of old testament in his name." Using the Lord's name in vain?