Pieter Wuille [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-06 📝 Original message:On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-06
📝 Original message:On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> I also agree with Pieter, that this should *not* be so cleanly compatible
> with Bitcoin transactions. If you wish to share code, perhaps using an
> invalid opcode rather than OP_RETURN would be appropriate.
Using an invalid opcode would merely send funds into the void. It wouldn't
invalidate the transaction.
--
Pieter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150606/e8ba6131/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> I also agree with Pieter, that this should *not* be so cleanly compatible
> with Bitcoin transactions. If you wish to share code, perhaps using an
> invalid opcode rather than OP_RETURN would be appropriate.
Using an invalid opcode would merely send funds into the void. It wouldn't
invalidate the transaction.
--
Pieter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150606/e8ba6131/attachment.html>